Not for nothing has René Girard been described as ‘the Darwin of the Social Sciences’. His key ideas have proved influential in academic disciplines as varied as Literary Criticism, Anthropology, Theology, Philosophy, History, Economics, Politics, Psychology and Psychiatry.
Calling this phenomenon ‘mimetic desire’ he became convinced that the European secular ‘Enlightenment’ of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries had been mistaken in seeing humans as heroically choosing their own desires, and in underestimating the influence of our human context in determining our lives.
That conclusion led him naturally into philosophy and anthropology – and a fascination with the Judeo-Christian scriptures. Seeing the thrice-repeated warning about ‘covetousness’ in the Decalogue as none other than a warning about mimetic desire, he saw this problem repeatedly illustrated in biblical stories such as that of Joseph and his brothers, and King Solomon’s judgement of the two women who claimed the same child. Arguing that mimetic desire was the key to understanding all conflict, he came to see it as the source of violent creation myths in all cultures – and of the universal archaic practice of blood sacrifice.
Arguing that this practice originated in the all-against-one practice of scapegoating or ‘lynching’ to defuse a social crisis, Girard at first opposed the belief that the greatest instance of this practice – the Gospel account of Jesus’ persecution and execution – could properly be described as a ‘sacrifice’. He was later led by the Austrian theologian Raymund Schwager to the conclusion that the idea of sacrifice is itself undergoing an evolution in the scriptures. Always also an intended gift to God, sacrifice had become, through Jesus, an act opposed to violence – an act of self-giving. ‘Priesthood’ too had thereby been transformed: the priest was no longer deflecting the violence of the community onto a separate innocent victim but making himself the bearer of that ‘sin’.
As this made Girard a philosophical defender of the uniqueness and objective truth of Christian revelation, as well as an observant Catholic, it made him also a target of ‘relativist’ academics. The latter reject all ‘meta-narratives’ (‘superstories’ which claim a supreme authority on the meaning and direction of human history). So he remains deeply controversial, as well as inspirational to many scholars of the different crises and controversies of secular thought.
Does that make him a ‘liberal’ or a ‘conservative’ in Catholic church controversies? Far more important, it makes his work a potential bridge between those two poles. Facing secular relativism squarely in defence of the Creeds, he nevertheless defies any comfortable acquiescence in Christendom, the long alliance between church and state that was undermined by the Enlightenment. Monopolising as it does the use of force, the state can itself easily become enmeshed in mimetic conflict – most dangerously evident in the nuclear arms race.
Seeing in Girard’s insights an especially potent ‘explainer’ of major current world problems, Sean O’Conaill and Aidan Hart of ACI have written a series of articles for this website. They remain convinced that the church at all levels needs to ‘wake up’ to the ‘Girardian revolution’ as a fertile source of Catholic intellectual recovery at all levels of the church. This page will point to these articles as they continue to appear, and to the work of other writers ‘sparked’ by Girard.
Sean O’Conaill’s early consumerist fantasy – explained by the work of René Girard, profound Catholic theoretician on the origins of violence.
We should not believe that Jesus intended violence – but that he has obliged us to choose repentance to achieve peace.
By applying René Girard’s theory of mimetic desire to the American Dream and national economies, Aidan Hart shows how it reveals their deep sickness and inevitable journey towards another global crisis, increasing violence and the disintegration of the social, moral and religious fabric of society. Has Christianity the answer?
René Girard’s insights into the origins of violence and over-consumption help to explain how the Crucifixion reconciles us humans to God.
In what sense is the Mass a ‘Holy Sacrifice’? Does God want violence? Can we instead understand ‘sacrifice’ as redefined by the Cross? Introduction to an important recent article by Anthony R. Lusvardi S.J.
This link will take you to the website of the most important academic community devoted to Girard’s work. It will give a vivid impression of the scale and scope of his ongoing influence – and you can join if you wish!